
Emilia Pérez
2024
Rate this movie
Average: 4.75 / 5
(4 votes)
Director
A narco-melodrama musical about gender transition. Reading that sentence back, it sounds like a pitch born from a peyote-fueled brainstorming session, the fever dream of a producer who’s just finished a compulsive rewatch of Narcos followed by a Douglas Sirk marathon. And yet, this chimerical cinematic creature, this glorious monster that answers to the name of Emilia Pérez, not only exists but is also the most audacious, brazen, and ultimately, coherent work of Jacques Audiard’s career. A director who has spent a lifetime plumbing the depths of toxic masculinity, from A Prophet to The Sisters Brothers, and who now decides not just to observe it, but to literally tear it to pieces, to subject it to radical surgery to see what’s left on the other side.
The premise, if told with the flatness of a newspaper brief, would sound absurd. Rita (a superb Zoe Saldaña), a brilliant but exploited lawyer at a corrupt Mexico City law firm, is kidnapped and brought before the country's most feared drug lord, Manitas del Monte. His request isn't for legal advice on laundering money or eliminating a rival, but something infinitely more complex and ontological: to help him disappear in order to finally become the woman he has always known himself to be. The operation is a three-part success: Manitas dies to the world, Emilia Pérez is born in Switzerland, and Rita receives a fee that launches her into the stratosphere of wealth. Years later, however, the past comes knocking. Emilia, now an impeccable philanthropist, rehires Rita for an even more impossible mission: to reconnect with her children, who believe their father is dead, without revealing her true identity.
Had this plot been entrusted to another director, we would likely have seen a dark, introspective drama or a high-tension thriller. Audiard, instead, makes the most insane and brilliant choice: he turns it into a pop opera. The characters, at moments of peak emotional tension or narrative turning points, explode into song and dance. The choreography isn't the polished sort from Broadway; it’s all bursts of raw energy, movements born from the dust of the streets and the marble of law offices, translating into gesture and melody what dialogue cannot contain. This is not an escape from reality, but an enhancement of it, an immersion into a form of hyperreality where feeling becomes spectacle. The effect is powerfully Brechtian. As in epic theatre, the songs interrupt the audience’s identification, forcing the viewer to reflect on the construction of the scene, on the intrinsic artifice of all representation. We are witnessing a Verfremdungseffekt with a ranchera flavor: Audiard shows us violence, corruption, and pain, but serves them on a platter of sequins and catchy choruses, creating a cognitive short-circuit that is at once alienating and exhilarating.
In this syncretism of genres, Karla Sofía Gascón's performance is the sun around which the entire system orbits. A trans actress who brings an incalculable weight of lived truth to the role, Gascón achieves a miracle of balance. Her Manitas is no caricature, but a man trapped in an armor of violence and power, whose cruelty is perhaps the most extreme form of self-defense. Her Emilia is not a simple liberation but a complex figure, haunted by the ghosts of her past, who seeks an almost divine form of maternity to atone for unforgivable sins. Her transition is not just physical, but ethical. And here the film poses its most radical and uncomfortable question: Can evil be transmuted into good? Can money stained with the blood of hundreds of victims be laundered to fund an organization that searches for the desaparecidos—often victims of the very system that generated that wealth?
Audiard offers no easy answers. In fact, he seems to suggest that capitalism, in its omnivorous logic, is capable of absorbing and metabolizing everything, even redemption. Emilia Pérez founds her NGO with the proceeds of drug trafficking, transforming criminal capital into social capital in an operation that is simultaneously an act of sincere contrition and a masterpiece of rebranding. It is the perverse logic of our time, in which even charity becomes a performance, an extension of power by other means. The film constantly walks this knife-edge, suspended between the sincerity of the most unbridled melodrama—replete with recognitions, secrets, and impossible loves, echoing a less glossy, more cruel Almodóvar—and the lucidity of a ruthless analysis of social mechanisms.
Orbiting Emilia are the other two key female figures. Zoe Saldaña gives a performance of extraordinary intelligence, playing Rita not as a sidekick, but as the film’s true narrative and moral engine. It is through her eyes—those of a pragmatic and disillusioned woman forced to navigate an ocean of madness—that we, the audience, find our compass. Her evolution from cynical accomplice to keeper of an impossible secret is the story's true dramatic arc. Selena Gomez, in the role of Jessi, Manitas’s unsuspecting wife, embodies violated innocence, the victim of a deception so colossal it borders on the mythological. Her performance, especially in the musical numbers, has a moving fragility, that of someone who finds herself dancing on the ruins of her own life.
Visually, the film is an explosion of saturated colors that seems to want to deny the darkness of its themes. Paul Guilhaume's cinematography paints Mexico in acidic, almost photo-novel hues, creating a jarring contrast between the flamboyant aesthetic and the latent brutality. It is a world where an interrogation can turn into a tap-dance number and a heart-wrenching confession can be belted out at the top of one's lungs. This approach, which could easily slide into the ridiculous, is instead the film's keystone. Audiard understands that to tell a story so extreme, so larger than life, realism is a cage. Only by embracing artifice, by flaunting the fiction, is it possible to touch the core of these characters' truth. As in Ophüls's Lola Montès, life becomes a circus, a performance for a paying audience, and identity is nothing more than the most elaborate costume.
Emilia Pérez is a work that defies categorization, a Frankenstein's monster of a film assembled from disparate genre pieces that, against all logic, not only stands on its own two feet but dances with an ungainly and irresistible grace. It is a film about the performativity of gender, certainly, but in a broader sense, it is a film about the performativity of everything: justice, family, morality, redemption. Manitas played the part of the alpha male; Emilia plays the part of the saintly benefactress. Both are masks, social constructs worn in order to survive. Perhaps, Audiard seems to tell us, the only truth lies in the very act of changing, in the unstoppable fluidity of being. It is an imperfect work, at times overwrought, that risks collapsing under the weight of its own ambitions. But its courage, its controlled madness, and its profound, unexpected humanity make it a rare and precious cinematic event. A work that sings and dances on the edge of the abyss, and invites us to do the same.
Main Actors
Gallery








Comments
Loading comments...