
Get Out
2017
Rate this movie
Average: 5.00 / 5
(1 votes)
Director
The lineage of cinematic monsters has always worn the face of the Other: the aristocratic vampire from Eastern Europe, the creature reanimated by a Promethean bolt of lightning, the formless alien from the stars. Jordan Peele, with his dazzling debut "Get Out", performs a Copernican inversion as simple as it is brilliant: the monster is not the Other, but us. Or, more precisely, it is the benevolent, accommodating smile of the American liberal bourgeoisie—the kind that would have “voted for Obama a third time, if they could have.” Terror lurks not in the darkness of a gothic castle, but in the blinding glare of a perfectly manicured suburban lawn during a sun-drenched garden party.
The film presents itself in the guise of a comedy of manners à la "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?", only to peel off its mask with the surgical precision of a Hannibal Lecter dissecting his victim. Chris, a talented Black photographer, is about to meet the parents of his white girlfriend, Rose Armitage. The initial tension, built on microaggressions and feignedly progressive embarrassments (“You know, my dad loves Tiger Woods”), is in itself an architecture of psychological terror. Every sentence is a trap, every compliment a weapon. Peele orchestrates this symphony of unease with the mastery of a Roman Polanski in "Rosemary's Baby", where evil is not an external intrusion but an intimate conspiracy, perpetrated by the very people who are supposed to protect you. Rose, like John Cassavetes' Guy Woodhouse, is the devil's agent disguised as a loving partner, and her single-family home is as sinister as the Dakota Building.
The greatness of "Get Out" lies in its ability to translate a social and historical anguish into a completely original horror iconography. The "Sunken Place," the state of hypnotic paralysis in which the matriarch Missy Armitage traps her victims, is one of the most powerful visual inventions of 21st-century cinema. It is the materialization of powerlessness, the literal representation of the loss of agency. Chris floats in a black and silent void, forced to watch the world through a tiny screen, his body moving without his consent, his screams producing no sound. It is an image that transcends the film itself, becoming a universal metaphor for marginalization, for the feeling of being a helpless passenger in one's own existence, a consciousness trapped in a narrative written by others. Aesthetically, it evokes the abysses of the psyche explored by the surrealism of a Salvador Dalí or a Luis Buñuel, but Peele infuses it with a cultural specificity that makes it painfully concrete.
If Ira Levin's "The Stepford Wives" (and its magnificent 1975 adaptation) satirized patriarchal subjugation in the placid suburbs of Connecticut, "Get Out" is its spiritual heir, transposing the conflict from gender to race. The Armitages and their friends do not want to eliminate Black people; on the contrary, they desire them. They covet them. But their desire is not a yearning for equality, but rather a predatory fetishization, an extreme form of consumerism applied to the human being. They desire the physical prowess of the athlete, the artistic eye of the photographer, the innate "coolness." It is a cultural appropriation that becomes a literal bodily appropriation through the blasphemous surgical procedure of the "Coagula." In this, the film approaches a certain current of weird fiction and body horror, but with a sociological lucidity that elevates it. The horror is not the mutation of the body, as in Cronenberg, but its expropriation. The body becomes a mere vessel, a prized shell for a decrepit consciousness.
Peele plays with the genre's codes with a superlative metatextual intelligence. The isolated country house, the loss of cell service, the strange behavior of the "help" (reminiscent of the Stepford automatons)—these are all horror clichés that are reprogrammed here to serve a social commentary. The character of Rod, Chris's friend and a TSA agent, is a stroke of genius. He is the voice of the seasoned horror viewer, the one who yells at the screen, “Don't go in that house!” He is the comic relief who, at the same time, represents the lucidity of the outside world—a sanity that seems like madness to those who cannot see the monstrosity hiding behind the courtesy.
Peele's work is deeply rooted in its time, yet its analysis transcends political contingency. Conceived during the Obama era, a period often described with the illusory label of "post-racial," the film acts like a sharp scalpel, incising that polished surface to reveal the rot underneath. The monster in "Get Out" is not the white supremacist with a swastika tattooed on his forehead, but the blind art dealer who covets Chris's "eye," or the neurosurgeon who wants his healthy body. This kind of evil is more insidious because it cloaks itself in admiration and progress, making the victim seem almost guilty of paranoia. Peele's clarity lies in understanding that objectification, even when disguised as a compliment, is a form of dehumanization.
One could even venture a parallel with the fiction of H.P. Lovecraft, an author whose cosmic genius was notoriously polluted by a profound racism. In "Get Out", the victims suffer a horror that is, in a sense, Lovecraftian: they are at the mercy of an ancient, powerful, and incomprehensible entity (the Armitage family cult), a secret order whose motives are as alien as they are terrifying. But Peele inverts Lovecraft's perspective: the threat comes not from the outside, from "impure" blood or alien deities, but from the very heart of the WASP establishment. The cosmic horror becomes a social horror.
Peele's choice to change the original ending—which saw Chris arrested by the police, in a bitterly realistic conclusion—in favor of a cathartic rescue by Rod was a crucial decision. It is not a naive happy ending, but an act of cinematic grace. After an hour and a half of suffocating tension and near-total helplessness, granting the protagonist and the audience an escape, a triumph—however momentary—transforms the film from a mere, albeit brilliant, social exegesis into a modern myth. A myth that acknowledges the horror, looks it straight in the eye, and, for once, allows the hero to get away. "Get Out" is a work that succeeds on every level: as a breathtaking thriller, as a ferocious satire, and as a cultural essay of rare intelligence. A film that doesn't just scare, but forces you to think, to look in the mirror, and to ask what might be hiding behind your own most reassuring smile.
Main Actors
Country
Gallery







Comments
Loading comments...