Movie Canon

The Ultimate Movie Ranking

Poster for Le Deuxième Souffle

Le Deuxième Souffle

1966

Rate this movie

Average: 4.00 / 5

(6 votes)

A Latin epigraph, often engraved on the cold stone of a sundial, reads: Vulnerant omnes, ultima necat. All hours wound, the last one kills. Jean-Pierre Melville, a watchmaker of fate and an architect of crepuscular universes, takes this maxim not as a title, but as a declaration of intent, the keystone for his most imposing and desolate monument, Le Deuxième Souffle. It is a phrase that serves as both prologue and epitaph, encapsulating the entire trajectory of its protagonist and the philosophy of its author.

Melville doesn't make films, he builds worlds. Hermetic worlds, sealed under a bell jar where the air is thin and the rules are those of an archaic chivalric code, now incomprehensible to the outside world. If the cinema of a contemporary like Godard was a chaotic laboratory that dismantled and reassembled cinematic language in real time, Melville’s is a temple. A temple dedicated to an idea of stoic masculinity, of professionalism as a secular liturgy, and of honor as the one, tragic moral compass. His is not the realism of the Nouvelle Vague, but a mythological hyper-realism. His gangsters are not criminals; they are priests of a dying cult, whose trench coats are sacred vestments and whose guns are ritual objects.

In this pantheon of men sworn to self-destruction, Gustave "Gu" Minda, embodied by the monumental physicality of Lino Ventura, is perhaps the most tragic figure. His escape from prison at the start of the film is not an opening to freedom, but the beginning of a via crucis. Gu isn't escaping to something; he's escaping into his own destiny. Every step he takes away from the prison brings him inexorably closer to a larger, more definitive trap: that of his own code. The "second wind" of the original title is not a promise of renewal, but the last, desperate gasp of a failing lung; the last round in the chamber, the final bet against a house that always wins.

The Melvillean universe is an abstraction. His cities, whether Paris or Marseille, are not geographical locations but moral topographies. Mental spaces, almost De Chirico-esque in their desolation, where characters move like pawns on a chessboard governed by an iron, inscrutable logic. Marcel Combes's cinematography bathes everything in a steely gray, a perennial midnight blue that is not so much a color as a state of the soul. It is the color of loyalty and betrayal, of solitude and impending death. Like a Flemish painter obsessed with vanitas, Melville fills his frames with objects—telephones, cars, weapons—that are not mere props, but emblems of a functional and ruthless world, devoid of any emotional flourish.

The narrative proceeds with the precision of a Swiss watch mechanism. The celebrated sequence of the armored van robbery on the desolate heights is an essay in pure cinema, a nearly twenty-minute ballet of calculated gestures and deafening silences. There is no music, only the sound of the wind, of engines, of metal. This is not action in the spectacular sense of the term; it is process. As in Dassin's Rififi, to which Melville owes an evident debt only to surpass it in ascetic rigor, the heist is a job, a trade executed with the dedication of a craftsman. It is in these moments that Melville’s cinema approaches that of Robert Bresson: the same attention to gesture, the same reduction of the human to a function, the same search for a transcendent truth not in psychology, but in physical action. But where Bresson’s goal is divine grace, Melville’s is the affirmation of a professional integrity that is the only form of redemption possible in a world without gods.

Lino Ventura offers a performance that transcends acting to become pure screen presence. His Gu is a monolith of contained suffering. His face, a granite mask etched with weariness, communicates more in a single silence than in a thousand words of dialogue. He is a character who seems to have walked out of the pages of Hemingway: a man defined not by what he says, but by what he does and, above all, by what he does not do. When he is unjustly accused of being an informant, his mission changes. The escape, the money, the future—all lose their importance. The only thing that matters is to restore his name, to reinstate his honor. Like a masterless samurai, a rōnin of the Parisian milieu, Gu is bound to a personal bushidō that forces him to retrace his steps to face death, rather than live in dishonor.

This obsession with the code already makes him an anachronistic figure in 1966. The world around him is changing. Younger gangsters are less interested in honor and more in profit. The police, embodied by the cunning and almost admiring Commissaire Blot (a superb Paul Meurisse, who seems to be the other side of Gu’s coin), use more subtle and psychological methods. Gu and Blot are two dinosaurs, the last representatives of two opposing yet specular orders, who understand and respect each other because they share the same absolute logic. Their final confrontation is not a clash between good and evil, but the mute dialogue between two professionals who know the game must end according to the rules, even if the rules lead to destruction.

The film is a meditation on time. The time of the escape, the time that is running out, the time that separates Gu from his freedom and, ultimately, from his end. Every scene is marked by an inexorable rhythm, a funeral march that offers no respite. Melville dilates and contracts duration at will, forcing the spectator into an almost hypnotic temporal dimension. One feels the weight of every minute, the heaviness of every hour that wounds. The last one, we know from the beginning, will kill. There is no suspense about what will happen, only about how and why. The tragedy lies not in the event, but in its inevitability.

In this sense, Le Deuxième Souffle is almost a Greek tragedy disguised as a polar. Gu Minda is an Oedipus who, instead of blinding himself, chooses to look his destiny in the face and walk toward it with his head held high. His hybris is not arrogance, but an unshakeable fidelity to himself. In an era, the late 1960s, that was preparing to challenge all forms of authority and rules, Melville signs his most classic and reactionary masterpiece—in the etymological sense of the term: a work that reacts to modernity by reaffirming the supremacy of ancient, absolute values. A film as cold as the steel of a pistol barrel, as precise as the ticking of a time bomb, and as desolately beautiful as an epitaph written on the tomb of an entire mythology. The final hour strikes, and the silence that follows is the deafening, perfect silence of masterpieces.

Country

Gallery

Immagine della galleria 1
Immagine della galleria 2
Immagine della galleria 3
Immagine della galleria 4
Immagine della galleria 5
Immagine della galleria 6
Immagine della galleria 7

Comments

Loading comments...