Movie Canon

A Thousand Films Worth Seeing

Poster for Pink Flamingos

Pink Flamingos

1972

Rate this movie

Average: 0.00 / 5

(0 votes)

Director

There are no filters for Pink Flamingos. There are no interpretative frameworks, sociological lenses, or academic theories that can prepare the viewer for what John Waters unleashed in 1972. This is not a film. It is an assault. It is an act of cultural terrorism perpetrated with a 16mm camera, a manifesto of “trash” aesthetics that does not seek to subvert the rules of good taste, but to douse them with gasoline and set them on fire. To include Pink Flamingos in a cinematic “canon” is a paradox, because its entire purpose is to destroy the very idea of a canon. It is patient zero of transgression, a film shot on a non-existent budget, with a cast of “misfits” (the Dreamlanders of Baltimore) and a single, glorious mission: to prove who was “the filthiest person alive.”

The film's aesthetic is its ethic. Pink Flamingos is deliberately, almost lovingly, ugly. It is grainy, overexposed, the sound is often a disaster, and the editing is rudimentary. But this is not incompetence; it is a declaration of war. Waters rejects Hollywood's polished veneer, “quality” as a yardstick. He embraces the immediate, the dirty, the amateurish as a form of authenticity. It's the ethos of punk rock applied to cinema, five years before the Sex Pistols shook up music. Waters' Baltimore is an anti-Disneyland, a parallel world where deviance is the norm and bourgeois respectability is the true perversion. It is cinema that does not want to be admired in a museum; it wants to be screened at midnight in a suburban cinema, leaving the audience torn between hysterical hilarity and pure nausea.

The plot, if we can call it that, is a mythological contest. On one side, we have the protagonist, the divine Babs Johnson (played by Divine, a charismatic 300-pound colossus, a true force of nature) . Babs lives in a hot pink trailer (the “flamingos” of the title) with her family: her egg-fetishist mother, Edie (the inimitable Edith Massey), who lives in a box, her degenerate son Crackers, and her friend Cotton. Babs is the current holder of the title of “Most Disgusting Person.” On the other side are the challengers, the Marbles. Connie and Raymond Marble are a bourgeois couple in appearance only. They run an adoption racket (kidnapping hitchhikers, getting them pregnant, and selling the babies to lesbian couples) and dabble in selling heroin in elementary schools. They invade Babs' title.

The ensuing war is not a psychological drama; it is an escalation of atrocities. Pink Flamingos operates according to a logic of accumulation. It is a contest to see who can disgust the viewer (and, in the film, the tabloids following the story) the most.

Waters stops at nothing, and the cast follows him with a loyalty that transcends acting and enters the realm of extreme performance art. The film aligns incest, cannibalism, castration, and an egg fetish that borders on the surreal. But the most famous act, the one that defined the film and “midnight movies,” is the infamous “singing anus” scene . It is not a metaphor. It is not a special effect. It is exactly what it says it is. It is the moment when Waters plants his flag and says, “From here on out, anything goes. Art has no moral limits.” It is a Dadaist gesture made with the body, a total rejection of any narrative or aesthetic convention.

The real protagonist, the axis around which this infected world revolves, is Divine. Pink Flamingos is her manifesto. Divine is not a “drag queen” in the modern sense of the term; she does not seek to imitate femininity, she devours it and regurgitates it in a new, monstrous and glorious form. With shaved and tattooed eyebrows, a tight red dress, and a gun in her hand, she is an icon of pure defiance. She is the celebration of the outcast, of the “monster” who does not hide but claims her right to exist at the center of the stage. Her performance is not acting; it is an act of existentialism. She is Babs Johnson. Her anger, her joy, her hunger are real. She is the perfect avatar for Waters' philosophy: “bad taste” is the only form of liberation in a society obsessed with “good taste.”

And then there's the ending. The punctum of the film. After defeating the Marbles in a sham trial in front of the paparazzi (carrying out the sentence herself), Babs must cement her victory. In a single, infamous long take, we see her walking down the street. She sees a dog defecating. She approaches, picks up the still-warm excrement, and eats it, looking straight into the camera with a triumphant smile. It is the act that made history. It is not simulated. It is real. It is the final point of the argument. Waters and Divine did not just represent disgust; they committed it. It is an act of scatological cinéma vérité, the only possible ending for a film that promised to be “an exercise in bad taste.” It is the ultimate victory. Babs Johnson is, without a doubt, the most disgusting person in the world.

Why is Pink Flamingos in the Canon? Because it is a historical document. It is the moment when the underground exploded, proving that a film could achieve success not in spite of its repulsiveness, but because of it. It redefined the boundaries of what is “filmable” and transformed John Waters from an amateur filmmaker in Baltimore to the “Pope of Trash.” It's not a film to be appreciated; it's a rite of passage, an endurance test, a work of art that stares you straight in the eye while eating excrement. And it is, in its own way, absolutely perfect.

Gallery

Immagine della galleria 1
Immagine della galleria 2
Immagine della galleria 3
Immagine della galleria 4
Immagine della galleria 5
Immagine della galleria 6
Immagine della galleria 7
Immagine della galleria 8

Comments

Loading comments...