Movie Canon

The Ultimate Movie Ranking

Poster for Red Desert

Red Desert

1964

Rate this movie

Average: 4.17 / 5

(6 votes)

An industrial landscape has never been so alien, so painterly, so terminal. The smokestacks of Ravenna, in the cinema of Michelangelo Antonioni, are not mere backdrops for a bourgeois drama, but become the spires of a post-human cathedral, a psychological exoskeleton that envelops and defines its inhabitants. "Red Desert" is not a film about alienation; it is the transposition of alienation itself onto celluloid, a sensory experience that precedes and overrides any narrative scaffolding. It is the point of no return for cinematic modernism, a work that leaves the rubble of neorealism behind to venture into a territory where psyche and landscape merge into a single, toxic entity.

Antonioni, in his first, dazzling encounter with color, commits an act of aesthetic violence with few equals in cinema history. Rejecting naturalistic mimesis, he treats the film stock like a canvas, going so far—in a now-legendary anecdote—as to literally paint the grass, the trees, the fruit, to bend chromatic reality to the inner turmoil of his protagonist, Giuliana. The result is a world shifted into sickly, saturated, unnatural hues. The red of the title is not that of passion or blood, but a chemical, industrial red, a perennial warning signal. The gray of the fog is not atmospheric; it is the polluted breath of a civilization on the brink of collapse. The yellow of the smoke billowing from the factories is not a detail; it is a poisonous miasma that becomes a visual metaphor for an existential malaise. It is as if a landscape by Mario Sironi, with its monumental and silent peripheries, had been recolored by a German Expressionist on a bad acid trip.

Giuliana, embodied by a never-more-fragile and spectral Monica Vitti, is the seismograph of this diseased world. Her "neurosis"—the consequence of a car accident that sounds more like a symbolic pretext than a clinical trauma—is not an individual pathology but a form of perceptual hypersensitivity. Giuliana is not mad; she is the only one who sees the world for what it has become: an assemblage of hostile surfaces, cacophonous sounds, and incomprehensible objects. Her gaze, lost and terrified, is our camera. Antonioni forces us to see through her eyes, to hear through her ears. The external world—the incessant rumble of machines, the hiss of steam, the metallic clang—becomes an extension of her inner clamor. The sound design, crafted with the precision of a musique concrète composer by Vittorio Gelmetti, is every bit as revolutionary as the cinematography. It is not a score, but a soundscape: an industrial symphony that obliterates any possibility of silence, introspection, or peace.

The plot, as is always the case with Antonioni, is a flimsy pretext, almost an annoyance. An engineer, Corrado Zeller (a bewildered, dubbed Richard Harris), arrives in Ravenna and develops a tenuous, impossible relationship with Giuliana, the wife of a factory manager. But the dialogue is made of voids, of clipped sentences, of communicative aphasia. The characters speak but do not listen, touch but do not feel. They are monads floating in an environment that has already digested them and turned them into its components. The famous "shack" scene on the pier, where a group of friends seeks a hedonistic and grotesque escape from boredom, transforms into a pathetic attempt at human connection that fails miserably. It is a failed orgy, an empty ritual that exposes the futility of sex and conviviality as antidotes to the cosmic void that surrounds them. One feels as if one is watching a play by Samuel Beckett set inside an installation by Anselm Kiefer.

In this desolate universe, the only true oasis is a hallucination, a story. It is the fable Giuliana tells her sick son: a story set on a pink beach, where a little girl swims happily and encounters a mysterious ship whose sails sing. This sequence is the film's emotional and metatextual keystone. For a moment, Antonioni grants us an escape route, an image of purity and harmony. But it is an artificial, dreamed-of, impossible purity. The sand is an unnatural pink, the song a fantasy. It is the memory of a world that perhaps never existed, a lost Eden that can only be evoked through the deforming filter of storytelling. This lyrical parenthesis only serves to sharpen, by contrast, the brutality of the real. It is the ghost of nature in a post-natural world.

"Red Desert" is a prophetic film. It anticipates our ecological anxieties, our dependence on dehumanizing technology, our growing difficulty in distinguishing between the real and its mediated representation. Giuliana's crisis is the crisis of contemporary humanity, crushed by a progress it can no longer control and which has turned the planet into its own industrial waste. One could draw direct lines connecting this film to the Zone in Tarkovsky's "Stalker," to the urban and psychological landscapes of David Lynch, to David Cronenberg's obsession with the mutation of body and environment. Antonioni, however, got there first, and with a chilling formal lucidity. There is no monster, no impending catastrophe; the catastrophe has already occurred. It is silent. It is everywhere. It is in the color of a peeling wall, in the hum of an electric cable, in the vacant gaze of a woman who no longer knows how to name things.

The final shot is one of the most merciless in the history of cinema. Giuliana walks with her son beside a smokestack spewing thick yellow smoke. The child asks, "But why is that smoke yellow?" Giuliana, with a resigned calm that is more terrifying than any scream, replies: "Because it's poisonous." Then she adds that the little birds know this by now and have learned not to fly through it. Adaptation. Not the cure, not escape, not rebellion, but adaptation to the poison. This is the film's terrible lesson. There is no going back. One can only learn to breathe the toxic air, to coexist with the desert we have built. "Red Desert" is not a film to be loved, but a film by which to be infected. It is an absolute masterpiece because it does not simply describe a condition but inoculates the viewer with it, forever altering their way of seeing the world, its colors, its wounds.

Genres

Countries

Gallery

Immagine della galleria 1
Immagine della galleria 2
Immagine della galleria 3
Immagine della galleria 4
Immagine della galleria 5
Immagine della galleria 6
Immagine della galleria 7

Comments

Loading comments...