Movie Canon

The Ultimate Movie Ranking

Poster for The Sound of Music

The Sound of Music

1965

Rate this movie

Average: 4.25 / 5

(4 votes)

Director

A colossus of saccharine sentimentality, a monolith of sacred kitsch, an exercise in emotional engineering so perfect that it transcends good taste and lands directly in the hyperuranium of cinematic myth. Analyzing “The Sound of Music” means handling highly dense cultural material, an artifact that has shaped the collective imagination with the same inexorable force with which Maria teaches the von Trapp children the diatonic scale.

To dismiss it as a simple family musical would be a huge critical mistake, the equivalent of mistaking the Sistine Chapel for a skillfully frescoed ceiling. Robert Wise's film, released in 1965, a year fraught with Cold War anxieties and the first dark omens of Vietnam, acts as a powerful counter-spell.

It is an injection of certainty in an age of doubt, a return to a fairy tale where Good and Evil have clear, Manichean contours, recognizable as the black uniforms of the SS against the white Tyrolean costumes. Its monumental success was no accident, but the response to a deep need to escape into an idealized past, an alpine Arcadia where every problem can be solved with a well-placed song and a pirouette on the lawn.

The narrative structure is archetypal, almost a carbon copy of the Bildungsroman applied not to a single individual but to an entire family unit. The arrival of Maria, played by Julie Andrews at the height of her post-novitiate Mary Poppins charisma, is the irruption of the Dionysian into an Apollonian universe. Captain von Trapp's villa (a magnificently stiff Christopher Plummer, who notoriously disliked the schmaltz of his role, calling the film “The Sound of Mucus”) is a realm of military order, punctuated not by clocks but by whistles. It is a closed, efficient, sterile system. The children are not individuals, but units in a domestic parade. Maria, with her guitar as a scepter and her anarchic faith in joy, is the agent of fruitful chaos. She does not bring the supernatural magic of P.L. Travers' nanny, but a more earthly and powerful magic: that of art. Her mission is a kind of sentimental re-education closely reminiscent of Rousseau's pedagogical theories: it is Nature, represented by mountains and spontaneous singing, that must redeem man from the artificial rigidity of civilization.

Robert Wise, a director with a solid craft (from The Day the Earth Stood Still to West Side Story, his versatility is astounding), understands that the fairy tale needs an equally monumental visual setting. Shot in Todd-AO 70mm, the film is a symphony for the eyes. The famous opening sequence, with its dizzying aerial tracking shot that zooms in on Julie Andrews at the top of a mountain, is not simply an aesthetic choice: it is a statement of intent. It is cinema at its most sublime and romantic, almost echoing the landscapes of Caspar David Friedrich but replacing existential angst with an all-American exuberance. The Salzburg Alps are not a backdrop, but a character, a divine theater that amplifies the purity of the story and the grandeur of Rodgers and Hammerstein's score. Every shot is calibrated to be iconic, every color saturated to the point of seeming hyperrealistic fantasy. Wise creates a popular Gesamtkunstwerk, a total work of art where music, landscape, and emotion merge into an enveloping and, ultimately, irresistible sensory experience.

But beneath the pastel-colored glaze lurks a looming darkness, and it is precisely in this short circuit that the film finds its unexpected depth. The Anschluss, the annexation of Austria by Nazi Germany, is not simply a plot twist in the third act. It is the serpent slithering into Eden. The film treats history with the abstraction of a fairy tale. Nazism is not analyzed in its complex and terrifying socio-political roots; it is presented as an abstract entity of Evil, a black stain that threatens to engulf the bright colors of Maria's world. Swastikas appear as evil symbols in a Tolkien story, and the hierarchs are operetta villains, whose threat is real but lacking in psychological depth.

This simplification, however, is not a flaw, but a choice that serves the film's meta-narrative thesis: art as the last bastion against tyranny. The progression is crystal clear. Initially, music serves to heal a dysfunctional family, to transform obedience into love. Later, it becomes an instrument of cultural identity. The scene in which the Captain, after years of silence, picks up his guitar and sings “Edelweiss” is extremely powerful. That simple folk song, invented for the musical but sounding as authentic as a secular anthem, becomes an act of passive resistance, an affirmation of belonging against the violent homogenization of Nazi ideology. Finally, in the unforgettable sequence of the singing festival, music becomes a strategic weapon, a diversion to orchestrate the escape. Art is no longer just comfort or identity, but an active tool of liberation. The von Trapp family does not escape the Nazis by fighting with weapons, but by singing. It is the definitive triumph of the film's poetics.

The final escape through the mountains (geographically inaccurate, as many have pointed out, since those mountains lead to Germany and not Switzerland, but who cares?) seals the transformation of the story into legend. The family does not simply escape; it ascends, literally, to a mythical plane, disappearing into the sublime landscape that had welcomed them at the beginning. They themselves become a story to be told, a symbol of hope.

“The Sound of Music” remains a fascinating paradox. It is a work that is deeply conservative in its values—the centrality of family, faith, and homeland—yet radical in its absolute belief in the redemptive and subversive power of creativity. It is a film whose smooth and reassuring surface conceals a surprisingly robust thematic core. Its influence is incalculable, not only on the musical genre, but on popular culture tout court, endlessly quoted, parodied, and paid homage to, from “Family Guy” to Lars von Trier in “Dancer in the Dark,” which brutally overturns its optimism. Watching it today means confronting the power of a cinema that was not afraid of sentiment, that knew how to build cathedrals of emotion with an almost shameless sincerity. A cinema that reminds us that, in the face of advancing darkness that wants to silence every voice, the bravest thing we can do, sometimes, is simply to start singing, beginning with Do, Re, Mi.

Genres

Gallery

Immagine della galleria 1
Immagine della galleria 2
Immagine della galleria 3
Immagine della galleria 4
Immagine della galleria 5
Immagine della galleria 6
Immagine della galleria 7

Comments

Loading comments...